Sativika Posted January 16 Posted January 16 https://www.nhltraderumor.com/nhl-trade-rumors-minnesota-wild-vancouver-canucks-eriksson-ek-kuzmenko-hoglander/?fbclid=IwAR0WBQye9pJtODg4AwQs5kGgx2z6TKumGzWZcISaS7Q6EYMTekzH9apnuIw Whadda' y'all think of this? He's not a right hander. Still, he'd be an asset of note for us. Thoughts? Quote
Popular Post PhillipBlunt Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 Kuzmenko, Hoglander, and a 1st is a massive overpayment for Eriksson Ek. Kuzmenko alone should get it done, with maybe a 2nd round pick. Hoglander is a great player, who's worth far more to the Canucks as a player on the roster, than as an add in on a trade. Trading to two roster players and the 2024 1st rounder should be for a top 4 RHD or a first line forward, not for a 2C. 6 7 3 4 2 Quote
Popular Post Johngould21 Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 Just now, PhillipBlunt said: Kuzmenko, Hoglander, and a 1st is a massive overpayment for Eriksson Ek. Kuzmenko alone should get it done, with maybe a 2nd round pick. Hoglander is a great player, who's worth far more to the Canucks as a player on the roster, than as an add in on a trade. Trading to two roster players and the 2024 1st rounder should be for a top 4 RHD or a first line forward, not for a 2C. If I'm PA and Minny is calling asking for that in return, I hope he hangs up. Kuz and a fourth is my ask. 1 3 1 1 Quote
PhillipBlunt Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Just now, Johngould21 said: If I'm PA and Minny is calling asking for that in return, I hope he hangs up. Kuz and a fourth is my ask. Agreed. 1 Quote
Popular Post Bob Long Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 5 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Kuzmenko, Hoglander, and a 1st is a massive overpayment for Eriksson Ek. Kuzmenko alone should get it done, with maybe a 2nd round pick. Hoglander is a great player, who's worth far more to the Canucks as a player on the roster, than as an add in on a trade. Trading to two roster players and the 2024 1st rounder should be for a top 4 RHD or a first line forward, not for a 2C. Kuzy and our late (hopefully very very late) 1st is an unperpayment for E-Ek. Adding Hogs might flip it to over, but I'd do it for the monster C depth. 1 1 5 5 2 1 Quote
flat land fish Posted January 16 Posted January 16 3 minutes ago, Bob Long said: Kuzy and our late (hopefully very very late) 1st is an unperpayment for E-Ek. Adding Hogs might flip it to over, but I'd do it for the monster C depth. Based on Minny's lack of cap room going forward they will want guys on ELC's. Something like Raty and a 1st or Raty and Lekkerimaki or Raty, Bruskewicz(sorry on spelling)and a draft pick Quote
Popular Post HorvatToBaertschi Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 Ek is a hell of a player. I'm not giving up Hoglander in any trade, personally. 4 1 Quote
Popular Post Alflives Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 3 minutes ago, flat land fish said: Based on Minny's lack of cap room going forward they will want guys on ELC's. Something like Raty and a 1st or Raty and Lekkerimaki or Raty, Bruskewicz(sorry on spelling)and a draft pick Zero chance Allvin moves Lekkerimaki. Won’t move Raty either. 1 2 1 1 Quote
I.Am.Ironman Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I'd like to keep Hogs. But I would do something around Kuz + 1st for Eriksson-Ek + Maroon. 2 1 1 Quote
flat land fish Posted January 16 Posted January 16 8 minutes ago, Alflives said: Zero chance Allvin moves Lekkerimaki. Won’t move Raty either. Need to tap into your ruthless side Ala the golden knights. The odds are against every prospect hitting. So if you can convert assets into top6 forwards or top 4 d you do it. 1 Quote
Denman Dragon Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Love the Hog, but would totally sacrifice him for a good 2C center on a long term good contract to up our Stanley Cup run. Add Pods to that line for a solid defensive 2nd line with offensive capabilities. 1 1 1 Quote
Popular Post VegasCanuck Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 From what I saw in this article, there is NO rumor that anyone is talking about in an official capacity, it is them making a suggestion that this would be a good trade to make. They didn't indicate that Minnesota has any interest in moving JEE. 3 4 3 3 Quote
Popular Post Crabcakes Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 7 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: From what I saw in this article, there is NO rumor that anyone is talking about in an official capacity, it is them making a suggestion that this would be a good trade to make. They didn't indicate that Minnesota has any interest in moving JEE. I don't see Minny moving their best centre, who is just entering his prime. 26 years old. Even if they're rebuilding. 1 1 4 1 Quote
Popular Post DeltaSwede Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 Isn't this website super unreliable and 100% made up rumors for clicks? 2 4 1 2 Quote
lionized27 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 12 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: From what I saw in this article, there is NO rumor that anyone is talking about in an official capacity, it is them making a suggestion that this would be a good trade to make. They didn't indicate that Minnesota has any interest in moving JEE. Yeah, I'm also reading more speculation than rumor. 2 1 Quote
Mike Vanderhoek Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Minnesota is not considering trading Ek, Guerin loves him and signed his latest contract. Further, Vancouver is not offering a Kuzmenko, Hoglander and a 1st. If Ek were to be acquired it would be Vancouver being persistent in discussions and creating a market for Ek much like they did when they targeted Hronek. As I've mentioned a dozen times, he is the perfect fit in Vancouver's top six and would be fantastic if brought in to this core long term. 1 Quote
Darius Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I really like this player, big center that can play second line minutes ...looks like a 20-30 goal scorer (on pace for like 30+ this year). He is young and on a good contract. Getting a player like this will allow them to keep the 6409 line together long term and will legitimately give the Canucks two top lines . The third line can go toe to toe with other teams bottom 6 and come out ahead most of the time. I have no idea what the cost would be. Why would the wild do this though? 2 Quote
Popular Post Dom Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 I'm pissed as FUCK if we give up Hoglander. 3 2 Quote
Nucker67 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I don't think Allvin would trade away both Kuzmenko and Hoglander for one guy. That would leave the Canucks short of quality NHL wingers, especially in the Top 6. I'll assume if there is a trade for Eriksson Ek it will be Kuzmenko, but only because the cap works. Just a guess: Kuzmenko, McDonough and a 1st (or something like that) Kuzmenko becomes quick friends with Kaprizov, and they both go on to score many goals. Pettersson - Miller - Boeser Hoglander - Eriksson Ek - Mikheyev Joshua - Blueger - Garland X - Suter - Lafferty Aman Karlsson I still think the 4th needs someone with size/toughness. Does Podkolzin possibly slot in down the stretch? Quote
Blitz-Pix Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) The reality is any move we do has to be money in money out. So if we're taking on $5 million roughly $5 million has to be going out....ala Kuzzy or Myers Adding an additional $1.1 million (Hoglander) to the money going out makes no sense to Minny that has its own Cap Hell to deal with. It would have to be Kuzzy or Myers plus draft picks and or prospects. IMO I'm really not sure any of this makes sense for Minny though as they'll want to stay competitive and taking Ek away makes them weaker down the middle...unless thier trying to make room for one of their prospects thats on an ELC. Personally I don't see this trade scenario working out... but you never know. I just don't want to retain salary on any deal. If we're going to move our 1st in a deal this year then I'd hope we hld onto our recent picks *Lekker, Willander, Hunter, Petterson as we;re gonna need those ELC's and talent to replenish our pipeline. Edited January 16 by Blitz-Pix 1 1 Quote
Popular Post NucksIn50 Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 I personally don’t want any players on the Canucks with the name Eriksson, it brings back nightmares. 11 1 2 Quote
Popular Post MeanSeanBean Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 (edited) 2 things. Minny wouldn't trade him for that package, and I'm shocked with the response from people here that Hoglander is the deal breaker in this trade? I like Hoglander as much as the next guy, but Joel is only a few years older and is currently one of the best 2 way centers in the league. Dude value is far more then a late first, a middle 6 winger at his peak (currently a 4th line) and a struggling winger who's having a hard time staying in the lineup this year. If we somehow managed to steal JEE for that package it would be an robbery. Adding him to our 2nd line, imo makes an instant contender, maybe cup favorite. Edited January 16 by MeanSeanBean 6 1 3 1 1 Quote
Popular Post higgyfan Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 49 minutes ago, Bob Long said: Kuzy and our late (hopefully very very late) 1st is an unperpayment for E-Ek. Adding Hogs might flip it to over, but I'd do it for the monster C depth. People are underrating E-Ek massively. On a team like the Canucks, he will be exactly what they need. Great 2-way game, with good offensive upside, while playing on an offensively underwhelming team, just turned 26yr on great contract ($5.25x5). All this for a LW that isn't able to fit onto his team, at least +25oa pick and Hogs, who doesn't seem to impress the coach (although he is likely the best part of the package. Great potential for becoming the forward version of Hronek. Problem is, unless they're planning to tank, why would Minni move their top C? 1 2 6 Quote
N7_Gyoza Posted January 16 Posted January 16 1 hour ago, flat land fish said: Based on Minny's lack of cap room going forward they will want guys on ELC's. Something like Raty and a 1st or Raty and Lekkerimaki or Raty, Bruskewicz(sorry on spelling)and a draft pick Based on our lack of cap room going forward WE will want guys on ELC's let's keep all 3 of these guys 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.