Whorvat Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 (edited) To Vancouver Logan Cooley Lawson Crouse 2024 UTAH 1st 2025 UTAH 1st 2024 FLORIDA 2nd 2025 TORONTO 2nd To Utah Elias Pettersson Why does Utah do this? They receive a player they can market the new franchise around, someone locked in for 8 more seasons. They have tons of cap space and picks. Petey may excel away from a hockey mad market, too. Why does Vancouver do this? They receive a player in Cooley who can grow with the current American core. Cap space to sign Lindholm. Picks to replenish prospect pool Do I think this will happen? No. Do I think Canucks are shopping Petey? No. But they'd be making a mistake not at least evaluating all possible options. Edited May 22, 2024 by Whorvat 1 Quote
qwijjibo Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 Lol. Utah says no. They can market Cooley at a fraction of the price. Pettersson's disappearing act since he signed his contract likely hasn't gone unnoticed by league gms. 1 Quote
Popular Post canucks curse Posted May 22, 2024 Popular Post Posted May 22, 2024 To VAN Sean Durzi Lawson Crouse To UTAH Hronek Hoglander 1 1 2 1 Quote
canucks curse Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 Hronek to TOR for Matt Knies and 2024 1st Quote
canucks curse Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 Hronek to TOR for Knies and 2024 1st ( we paid mid first and high 2nd) so this is comparable Milkeyev traded with sweetener no retention = 29.5 in cap space Tanev 4.5 x 3 Zads 4.5 x 5 Guentzel 8.5 x 6 Myers 3x 2 Bluegger 1.5 x 4 Joshua 3.75 x 4 Silovs 1.75 = 2.0 cap space Guentzel Petey Hoglander Knies Miller Brock Joshua Blueger Garland Podz Suter PDG/Aman Hughes Tanev Zads Myers Soucy Juulsen Demko silovs That team can win the cup Quote
MatchesMalone Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 2 hours ago, Whorvat said: To Vancouver Logan Cooley Lawson Crouse 2024 UTAH 1st 2025 UTAH 1st 2024 FLORIDA 2nd 2025 TORONTO 2nd To Utah Elias Pettersson Why does Utah do this? They receive a player they can market the new franchise around, someone locked in for 8 more seasons. They have tons of cap space and picks. Petey may excel away from a hockey mad market, too. Why does Vancouver do this? They receive a player in Cooley who can grow with the current American core. Cap space to sign Lindholm. Picks to replenish prospect pool Do I think this will happen? No. Do I think Canucks are shopping Petey? No. But they'd be making a mistake not at least evaluating all possible options. Would Utah even trade Cooley for Pettersson one for one? Quote
EB43 Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 22 minutes ago, MatchesMalone said: Would Utah even trade Cooley for Pettersson one for one? No. Quote
smithers joe Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 10 hours ago, canucks curse said: To VAN Sean Durzi Lawson Crouse To UTAH Hronek Hoglander hronek and mikheyev. would work for me. Quote
qwijjibo Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 21 minutes ago, Visp said: According to Capfriendly, Utah don't have ONE D-man signed for 24/25 yet, all RFA or UFA's! We should capitalize on that! DEFENSE (0) TERMS POS STATUS ACQUIRED AGE CAP% 2024-25 Durzi, Sean LD/RD NHL Trade 25 RFA RFA Moser, J.J. LD/RD NHL Draft 23 RFA RFA Välimäki, Juuso LD NHL Waivers claim 25 RFA RFA Brown, Joshua RD NHL Signed 30 UFA UFA Dermott, Travis LD/RD NHL Signed 27 UFA UFA Capitalize how? Its not like Vancouver has a wealth of excess NHL quality D to use as trade chips. Utah also has lots of cap space. They can easily get their rfa's signed and go shopping in the ufa market. They can outbid for guys like Zadorov if they want to. Quote
Bobby James Posted May 22, 2024 Posted May 22, 2024 18 hours ago, canucks curse said: To VAN Sean Durzi Lawson Crouse To UTAH Hronek Hoglander we're giving up way more here. Hoglander is still coming into his best game and just scored 20. Hronek is better then Durzi by a bit (I just don't want to pay him 7.5+ million). In terms of the Petey trade to Utah, yeah they say no. That haul is wild. Also I don't want to trade Petey. Still think he is elite and will get better (similar to how Miller is much better all around now then he was at 25). Quote
higgyfan Posted May 23, 2024 Posted May 23, 2024 I hadn't considered the idea of an EP trade, as he was supposed to be the team's franchise player. I have no doubt that he will return to his greatness after an offseason of training. He always seems to bounce back. I find it strange that his NMC doesn't kick in until the second year of his contract. Quote
qwijjibo Posted May 23, 2024 Posted May 23, 2024 17 minutes ago, higgyfan said: I hadn't considered the idea of an EP trade, as he was supposed to be the team's franchise player. I have no doubt that he will return to his greatness after an offseason of training. He always seems to bounce back. I find it strange that his NMC doesn't kick in until the second year of his contract. You can only have movement clauses on ufa years. The first year counts as a rfa year 1 Quote
Elias Pettersson Posted May 26, 2024 Posted May 26, 2024 On 5/21/2024 at 9:22 PM, canucks curse said: To VAN Sean Durzi Lawson Crouse To UTAH Hronek Hoglander I’d do this deal in a heartbeat. Durzi is underrated. Put him with Hughes and he’s getting 50-60 points easy. Crouse is a beast. The perfect power forward for Petey. I’d even add to get this deal done. Quote
Alflives Posted May 26, 2024 Posted May 26, 2024 On 5/21/2024 at 9:22 PM, canucks curse said: To VAN Sean Durzi Lawson Crouse To UTAH Hronek Hoglander Utah would need to add their first but it’s pretty close to fair value. Quote
T. Demko Posted May 27, 2024 Posted May 27, 2024 On 5/21/2024 at 9:22 PM, canucks curse said: To VAN Sean Durzi Lawson Crouse To UTAH Hronek Hoglander Would do this all day but I don't think Utah does it unless we add. Durzi and Hronek is a wash with Durzi probably having a lower cap. Crouse has more value than Hoglander right now. They'd probably want a B+ prospect added to even out value wise, but even then, not sure why they'd pull this deal on their end. No real value added for them, but we get a PF for Petey. Quote
Alflives Posted May 27, 2024 Posted May 27, 2024 55 minutes ago, T. Demko said: Would do this all day but I don't think Utah does it unless we add. Durzi and Hronek is a wash with Durzi probably having a lower cap. Crouse has more value than Hoglander right now. They'd probably want a B+ prospect added to even out value wise, but even then, not sure why they'd pull this deal on their end. No real value added for them, but we get a PF for Petey. On their board their fans would think we add. On our board our fans think they add. Our fans, of course, are correct. Quote
Elias Pettersson Posted May 27, 2024 Posted May 27, 2024 (edited) 2 hours ago, T. Demko said: Would do this all day but I don't think Utah does it unless we add. Durzi and Hronek is a wash with Durzi probably having a lower cap. Crouse has more value than Hoglander right now. They'd probably want a B+ prospect added to even out value wise, but even then, not sure why they'd pull this deal on their end. No real value added for them, but we get a PF for Petey. To Arizona: Thatcher Demko Filip Hronek To Vancouver: Lawson Crouse Maveric Lamoureux Arizona 2024 1st (6th overall) I would then shop the 6th overall pick to get a top 4 RHD to play with Hughes. To Columbus: Arizona 2024 1st (6th overall) To Vancouver: David Jiricek Hughes Jiricek Zadorov Willander Pettersson Lamoureux Oh baby, our defence is set for the next decade. Edited May 27, 2024 by Elias Pettersson 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.