Screw Posted June 13 Posted June 13 This is the guy I wanted the year Canucks selected Virtanen. Quote
Hammertime Posted June 13 Posted June 13 No fit here. I would rather play Hog for 1m than Ehlers at 6 and fry bigger fish with the 5m 1 Quote
RWJC Posted June 13 Posted June 13 1 hour ago, Rip The Mesh said: Hey Boss, there’s already a thread going on this. Care to merge? Thanks! Quote
MeanSeanBean Posted June 13 Posted June 13 7 hours ago, RWJC said: Hey Boss, there’s already a thread going on this. Care to merge? Thanks! @Rip The Mesh Quote
Alflives Posted June 13 Posted June 13 8 hours ago, Hammertime said: No fit here. I would rather play Hog for 1m than Ehlers at 6 and fry bigger fish with the 5m Yup. Trade Garland for cap room and pkay Hogs in those minutes. Then use the saved four mil to apply to Guentzel. Quote
tas Posted June 13 Posted June 13 (edited) would be a far better fit for the canucks than laine. they need speed in the top 6. Edited June 13 by tas Quote
Alflives Posted June 13 Posted June 13 2 minutes ago, tas said: would be a far better fit for the canucks than laine. they need speed in the top 6. Yes, that’s for certain. The Jets like to trade for guys with some term left. Then they have them hostage. would Garland for Ehlers be fair? Quote
Hammertime Posted June 13 Posted June 13 6 minutes ago, Alflives said: Yup. Trade Garland for cap room and pkay Hogs in those minutes. Then use the saved four mil to apply to Guentzel. Gosh youre annoying. Where do you find the other 5m? I don't understand how you don't see how important a role Garland plays for us. Hogs doesn't fill those shoes. Did you not watch the playoffs? Quote
Rip The Mesh Posted June 13 Author Posted June 13 9 hours ago, RWJC said: Hey Boss, there’s already a thread going on this. Care to merge? Thanks! Sorry, missed that. If I knew how I would. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.