Michael Scott Posted June 14, 2024 Posted June 14, 2024 (edited) Trade#1: Vancouver gets: 5th round pick (2024) Montreal gets: Connor Garland Chicago gets: Ilya Mikheyev 2nd pick ( Colordo from Montreal) Reason: 3 way trade; purpose is to create cap space. Montreal adds forward to their group who can help score. Chicago takes cap dump for 2nd. Trade#2: Vancouver gets: 1st pick 2025 2nd pick 2025 Utah gets: Rights to Hronek Reason: Hronek maybe asking too much. I do believe we could get the 1st and 2nd back to add to our prospects. Utah gets a top 4 RHD who fits their age group. RFA SIGNINGS: Arturs Silovs 2 years @ $1,250,000 RE-SIGNINGS: Tyler Myers 2 years @ $3,100,000 Teddy Blueger 2 years @ $2,175,000 UFA SIGNINGS: Jake Guentzel 7 years @$9,300,000 John Klingberg 1 year @ $1,650,000 Brett Pesce 5 years @$6,200,000 Brendon Dillon 2 years @$2,800,000 Danton Heinen 3 years @$2,800,000 Kevin Stenlund 2 years @$1,300,000 Daniel Sprong 3 years@$4,000,000 Yakov Trenin 3 years @$2,500,000 Roster Size: 23 Cap hit: $87,846,667 Cap space: $153,333 Guentzel Pettersson Höglander Suter Miller Boeser Heinen Blueger Sprong Trenin Stenlund Podkolzin Hughes Pesce Soucy Myers Dillon Klingberg Demko Silovs Extra: Åman + Di Giuseppe + Juulsen https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1JPtGk5m_S9VuR5e7T8lb_BlilXRwJPF0V2ddQzjjpvc/htmlview#gid=0 was used to get salary for signings. Edited June 14, 2024 by Michael Scott 1 Quote
Snoop Hogg Posted June 14, 2024 Posted June 14, 2024 Garland can fetch more than a 5th rounder after the season he just had. Quote
Michael Scott Posted June 14, 2024 Author Posted June 14, 2024 Garland goes to Montreal for a 2nd. That 2nd is used to move Mikheyev. Quote
fuzzy Posted June 14, 2024 Posted June 14, 2024 Interesting. I like the idea of seeing if Klingberg has anything left. Quote
qwijjibo Posted June 14, 2024 Posted June 14, 2024 I don't see Montréal having any interest in Garland. They're looking for high end pieces. Not middle 6 guys. Plus they already have their quota on undersize players. Garland is fine but he'd fill the same role as one of thier young guys (Roy, RHP,Farrell, ect...) Quote
Michael Scott Posted June 15, 2024 Author Posted June 15, 2024 @qwijjibo I just picked Montreal as a team. Ideally any team that will take Garland at full cap hit was the plan. Use that 2nd to dump mikeyev's contract. Quote
qwijjibo Posted June 15, 2024 Posted June 15, 2024 31 minutes ago, Michael Scott said: @qwijjibo I just picked Montreal as a team. Ideally any team that will take Garland at full cap hit was the plan. Use that 2nd to dump mikeyev's contract. Just saying he's not really a fit for Montreal. I get the concept you're going fir, but it's gotta work for every team involved Quote
VegasCanuck Posted June 15, 2024 Posted June 15, 2024 On 6/14/2024 at 7:20 AM, Michael Scott said: Garland goes to Montreal for a 2nd. That 2nd is used to move Mikheyev. Yup, I was thinking that after his season and playoffs, he's at least a 2nd. His contract is better than people think. His production isn't always the best, but he's a player who can change the entire flow of a game with one shift. That's rare. 1 Quote
fuzzy Posted June 15, 2024 Posted June 15, 2024 1 hour ago, VegasCanuck said: Yup, I was thinking that after his season and playoffs, he's at least a 2nd. His contract is better than people think. His production isn't always the best, but he's a player who can change the entire flow of a game with one shift. That's rare. There is probably a team out there that sees Garland as a 1st line or top 6 player. His trade value will never be higher. 1 Quote
qwijjibo Posted June 15, 2024 Posted June 15, 2024 1 hour ago, fuzzy said: There is probably a team out there that sees Garland as a 1st line or top 6 player. His trade value will never be higher. I guarantee there's not a tesm in the league that would seek Garland out with the intention of him being a top line player. Middle 6 sure, top line? Not a chance Quote
fuzzy Posted June 15, 2024 Posted June 15, 2024 12 minutes ago, qwijjibo said: I guarantee there's not a tesm in the league that would seek Garland out with the intention of him being a top line player. Middle 6 sure, top line? Not a chance I wouldn't go that far. Every team values players differently and how they may fit their roster. Did anyone anticipate Alex Burrows as a 1st line player? No, but on the 2011 team ( an excellent team) he was. I'm not saying Garland is Burrows and I certainly don't think he's a top 6 fit on this team. But, another team may view him differently. Now is the time to find out Quote
qwijjibo Posted June 15, 2024 Posted June 15, 2024 1 minute ago, fuzzy said: I wouldn't go that far. Every team values players differently and how they may fit their roster. Did anyone anticipate Alex Burrows as a 1st line player? No, but on the 2011 team ( an excellent team) he was. I'm not saying Garland is Burrows and I certainly don't think he's a top 6 fit on this team. But, another team may view him differently. Now is the time to find out Not a chance Quote
Michael Scott Posted June 16, 2024 Author Posted June 16, 2024 5 hours ago, qwijjibo said: Not a chance Garland could easily be a missing piece on a top line. By himself, no he's not a top line winger. He could be a complimentary piece. Quote
qwijjibo Posted June 16, 2024 Posted June 16, 2024 28 minutes ago, Michael Scott said: Garland could easily be a missing piece on a top line. By himself, no he's not a top line winger. He could be a complimentary piece. No gm is looking at a 20 goal 40 point winger as the solution on thier top line. He may fill in occasionally but using Garkand as your top line winger is like going out for a classy dinner and choosing Dennys. Quote
Michael Scott Posted June 16, 2024 Author Posted June 16, 2024 39 minutes ago, qwijjibo said: No gm is looking at a 20 goal 40 point winger as the solution on thier top line. He may fill in occasionally but using Garkand as your top line winger is like going out for a classy dinner and choosing Dennys. A 20 goal scorer averaging 14-15 mins. Teams for the most part are going with pairs. Garland is great on fore-check and an excellent complimentary piece. Tbh I do consider him more of a middle 6, with the ability to move up. With that being said, I could see a team trading a 2nd for him. 2 years left, under $5million. 1 Quote
German Canuck Posted June 16, 2024 Posted June 16, 2024 (edited) Very exciting offseason with this amount of cap space. Good core and a lot of cap space to support them. Great time to be a canuck. Sign Hronek / Zadorov plus one UFA like Tanev or Dillon and the Defence is set. Sign Blueger plus Trade Mikheyev. Sign Guentzel or another top 6 winger plus some cheaper depth players then Joshua will be after this season. They can build a contender for years if they use this cap space for the right players. They can be creative and get some guys who fit very well to the "new" Canucks system. The future looks bright Demko Silovs Hughes UFA Zadorov Hronek Soucy Myers Juulsen Guentzel Pettersson Hoglander Suter Miller Boeser Garland Blueger Podkolzin Di Giuseppe Aman UFA or Player like Bains ? ? Edited June 16, 2024 by German Canuck 1 Quote
Alflives Posted June 16, 2024 Posted June 16, 2024 6 hours ago, Michael Scott said: A 20 goal scorer averaging 14-15 mins. Teams for the most part are going with pairs. Garland is great on fore-check and an excellent complimentary piece. Tbh I do consider him more of a middle 6, with the ability to move up. With that being said, I could see a team trading a 2nd for him. 2 years left, under $5million. For sure we are trying to move off Garland’s cap. And there will be a GM of a bottom feeder club who sees Garland as a top line guy because they don’t have much yet. Caufield is used by the Haberdoodles as a top line winger. He’s a very similar player to Garland who gets opportunity because he’s on a bottom feeder team. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.