Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Joshua.Guy said:

That's a big contract for a 30 year old who never cracked 50 points, even on a stacked team.

 

Lolwut

 

His point totals the last three seasons were 64, 65, and 51

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Wheres Wellwood said:

He's passed 50 points multiple times 

Oh I see. Those were assists. I like his game but still seems like a lot of term especially 

  • Haha 1
Posted
Just now, Coconuts said:

 

Lolwut

 

His point totals the last three seasons were 64, 65, and 51

I was looking at the assist line. Lol. Still too big of a contract imo

  • Cheers 1
Posted
Just now, Joshua.Guy said:

I was looking at the assist line. Lol. Still too big of a contract imo

 

I'd do the cap hit, the term is what makes it ugly 

Posted
2 minutes ago, MeanSeanBean said:

Makes me.like the DeBrusk contract more

This.  I don't love the DeBrusk contract, but willing to give it an open mind once they start playing games.  At these terms and AAV, I'll take DeBrusk over Stephenson.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted

He's an incredible defensive forward. Could be a good deal. Should get more Selke attention than he does.

Posted
4 minutes ago, stawns said:

Man, the Canucks, as is, are going to be up against it to get to the post season

I have a hard time seeing them below 3 teams in the Pacific.. 

Screenshot_20240701-110211.png

Posted
8 minutes ago, Joshua.Guy said:

I have a hard time seeing them below 3 teams in the Pacific.. 

Screenshot_20240701-110211.png

The kraken got much better today and in the central Nashville got waaaaay better.

 

If they fall out of the top 3, it's going to be tough to get a WC spot, imo.  That said, they can still make trades. 

Posted
16 minutes ago, stawns said:

The kraken got much better today and in the central Nashville got waaaaay better.

 

If they fall out of the top 3, it's going to be tough to get a WC spot, imo.  That said, they can still make trades. 

Maybe. Canucks didn't get worse by any means and won the division last season. I can see Edmonton and Vegas over Canucks next season but I see them top 3 at the very least.

Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Joshua.Guy said:

Maybe. Canucks didn't get worse by any means and won the division last season. I can see Edmonton and Vegas over Canucks next season but I see them top 3 at the very least.

 

 

Right now, I think the Canucks roster is not as strong as last year

Edited by stawns
  • Haha 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, stawns said:

 

 

Right now, I think the Canucks roster is not as strong as last year

Yea as much as there's a lot of optimism that Debrusk will click on our top 6, losing Lindholm and Zadorov hurt. I'm saying this without knowing how our other depth signings will work out, but at least on paper I don't see us as a better team compare to yesterday. We have a bit of a cap room so let's see what PA and JR will do in December. 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, stawns said:

Man, the Canucks, as is, are going to be up against it to get to the post season

You said this last season and we won the division so this comment is meaningless 😂

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...