Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

call me an idiot, but didn't Edmonton just LOSE Lavoie on waivers just 2 days ago?

Posted
1 hour ago, grumpyone said:

call me an idiot, but didn't Edmonton just LOSE Lavoie on waivers just 2 days ago?

 

57 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Yeah they did. They did a Patera on him. 

 

I hope someone claims him again, it'd be funny

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Cheers 1
Posted
1 hour ago, DeNiro said:

Well I mean we’re obviously gonna claim Lindstrom no?

Nope.  We have a Brannstrom now.  Met our quota of 'stroms for the week.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Blue said:

 

 

Lol. This is way funnier than the original waiver claim. 

 

Does this mean Oilers would have to waiver someone to make room for him?

 

Edit x2:

 

 

Edited by Down By the River
  • Cheers 1
  • ThereItIs 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Down By the River said:

 

Lol. This is way funnier than the original waiver claim. 

 

Does this mean Oilers would have to waiver someone to make room for him?

 

Edit x2:

 

 


We have a roster spot open. 😆

 

Would be funny to claim him.

Posted

Curious who also put a claim in on Lavoie. 6'4, 216 pounds, C/RW, still just 24 years old. I think we're beyond being desperate for waiver bait, but seems like he isn't ordinary waiver bait. Sounds like a few higher ranked teams are interested too, Vegas reclaiming him could just send him down. Which is funny to think about. This likely means Edmonton just tries to keep him on the roster. But I think he's starting in the NHL, just a matter of where.

Posted
15 minutes ago, JeremyCuddles said:

Curious who also put a claim in on Lavoie. 6'4, 216 pounds, C/RW, still just 24 years old. I think we're beyond being desperate for waiver bait, but seems like he isn't ordinary waiver bait. Sounds like a few higher ranked teams are interested too, Vegas reclaiming him could just send him down. Which is funny to think about. This likely means Edmonton just tries to keep him on the roster. But I think he's starting in the NHL, just a matter of where.


I think their cap plans probably trump keeping him on the roster.

 

They were okay potentially losing him once after all.

Posted
7 minutes ago, DeNiro said:


I think their cap plans probably trump keeping him on the roster.

 

They were okay potentially losing him once after all.

I can only assume they didn't think he'd get claimed. They did claim him back after all.

  • Cheers 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Western Red said:

I guessed CAR

 

As far I know it hasn't been confirmed yet so one or neither of could be right.

  • Upvote 1
Posted
2 hours ago, JeremyCuddles said:

I can only assume they didn't think he'd get claimed. They did claim him back after all.


I dunno he should be a coveted player on paper, especially to a young team.

 

Surprised Montreal didn’t claim him.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Captain insano said:

Poor kid can’t get away from the asshole of Canada they call Edmonton 

 

That's Calgary. Edmonton is the crack a little higher up.

  • Haha 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...