Bounce000 Posted November 9 Posted November 9 Is this the rebuild the Preds we’re talking about? 2 Quote
Alflives Posted November 9 Posted November 9 4 minutes ago, Coconuts said: C'mon folks, fill your boots Couldn’t even find a trade to dumperoo this marshmallow. 2 Quote
Coconuts Posted November 9 Author Posted November 9 1 minute ago, Bounce000 said: Is this the rebuild the Preds we’re talking about? No, it's a retool The rebuild comes later 3 1 Quote
PureQuickness Posted November 9 Posted November 9 I'm kind of confused why Nashville was not able to find a trading partner of some kind. I don't know how the Canucks would be able to fit Fabbro, but it would be really interesting if we could acquire him. Quote
LB28 Posted November 9 Posted November 9 (edited) Dante Fabbro has a 2.5M contract that ends this season Canucks wouldn't accrue cap with him on the books Edited November 9 by LB28 1 Quote
Nucker67 Posted November 9 Posted November 9 Didn't the Canucks have interest in getting Fabbro a while back? Maybe he just needs a change of scenery. Quote
Coconuts Posted November 9 Author Posted November 9 5 minutes ago, DeNiro said: How bad has he been? Wow… Bad enough that we could pluck him off waivers to save our defense 2 Quote
Popular Post DeNiro Posted November 9 Popular Post Posted November 9 Just now, LB28 said: Dante Fabbro 2.5M has a contract that ends this season I don't see Canucks going for it with the way Allvin is trying accrue cap Don’t need more projects either. If we acquire a D it needs to be a bonafide top 4. 6 4 2 Quote
Alflives Posted November 9 Posted November 9 1 minute ago, HKSR said: Maybe this is the reason why we dumped Sprong. 2.5 mil for Fabbro though. Press likely couldn’t trade him because Trotz only has one retention spot left. We would have zero interest in him. Quote
Captain insano Posted November 9 Posted November 9 I really hope our managment is smart enough to realize this guy isint going to upgrade our back end in any way shape or form 2 2 Quote
Popular Post RakuRaku Posted November 9 Popular Post Posted November 9 Don't need him since we got Brannstrom that's fitting in so well! 4 2 1 1 2 Quote
Popular Post Rekker Posted November 9 Popular Post Posted November 9 4 minutes ago, RakuRaku said: Don't need him since we got Brannstrom that's fitting in so well! This. Brannstrom has been a very pleasant surprise. 2 2 1 Quote
RWJC Posted November 9 Posted November 9 I imagine EDM will be all over him if he’s available to them 2 Quote
CaptainCanuck12 Posted November 9 Posted November 9 21 minutes ago, HKSR said: Maybe this is the reason why we dumped Sprong. You gotta wonder, but I hope not. I'm sure Allvin and Rutherford could make much better use of that cap space some time before the TDL. 2 1 Quote
Popular Post Rekker Posted November 9 Popular Post Posted November 9 (edited) 5 minutes ago, RWJC said: I imagine EDM will be all over him if he’s available to them Does Fabro have enough off ice issues for the Oilers though? Lol Edited November 9 by Rekker 5 Quote
Hammertime Posted November 9 Posted November 9 Wow statistically speaking without having watched the games he looks really unlucky this season. Corsi, Fenwick arent terrible. On ice G% 28.6 just brutal. Expected on ice G% 50.7. Has he truly been that awful or is it just a case of really bad puck luck. He's played predominantly with Josi so really tough matchups. Quote
HKSR Posted November 9 Posted November 9 23 minutes ago, Alflives said: 2.5 mil for Fabbro though. Press likely couldn’t trade him because Trotz only has one retention spot left. We would have zero interest in him. 5 minutes ago, CaptainCanuck12 said: You gotta wonder, but I hope not. I'm sure Allvin and Rutherford could make much better use of that cap space some time before the TDL. He IS a RHD tho... they're a bit harder to come by. Depends if Foote and Gonchar think they could transform him into a top 4. 1 Quote
Coconuts Posted November 9 Author Posted November 9 (edited) 11 minutes ago, RWJC said: I imagine EDM will be all over him if he’s available to them I'd be surprised if he makes it that far If I had to guess the Ducks will take him Fowler shoots left, Dumoulin shoots left, Vaakanainen shoots left, LaCombe shoots left, Mintyukov shoots left, Zellweger shoots left Gudas is the only D on their roster right now who shoots right San Jose has plenty of room for a project too Edited November 9 by Coconuts 3 Quote
HKSR Posted November 9 Posted November 9 6 minutes ago, Coconuts said: I'd be surprised if he makes it that far If I had to guess the Ducks will take him Fowler shoots left, Dumoulin shoots left, Vaakanainen shoots left, LaCombe shoots left, Mintyukov shoots left, Zellweger shoots left Gudas is the only D on their roster right now who shoots right San Jose has plenty of room for a project too Yeah somebody is gonna take him. RHD for $2.5M that still has upside is gonna be claimed. 1 Quote
canucks curse Posted November 9 Posted November 9 47 minutes ago, Nucker67 said: Didn't the Canucks have interest in getting Fabbro a while back? Maybe he just needs a change of scenery. It was a garland to NSH rumour for fabbro+ something to balance cap Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.