Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’d prefer Risto to Vinny.  With some retention on Risto and Desharnais going the other way, it could be palatable.

 

The cost on that move would be high, though.  And we need a guy to carry the 2nd pair, not a luxury item on the 3rd pair.  
 

Doesn’t seem like a fit.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Good god not this again. 
Guy is big and moves well but is a career loser. Everywhere he goes sucks. Some of that is situation, some of that is teams keep paying this guy big money  to win when he has no idea what that means. 
Please PA stay away. 

Edited by DrJockitch
  • Like 2
Posted

I agree that Ristolainen is not very good.  Sanheim, on the other hand,  I could get excited about.  Sanheim is also on a very reasonable $6.25 mil contract ending in 2030/31.  I wonder what it would take to get him from Philly?  Obviously a lot.

Posted

IMO we should be targeting a long term 2nd pair lefty. Whether that's a pending UFA like Pettersson or Lindgren or even better (though more unlikely) pending RFA like Miller, Romanov etc.

 

If we're targeting a righty, I'd far, FAR prefer Borgen. Risto would just be another, more expensive Myers and not what we really need. But unfortunately with Myers extended, I think our right side "is what it is" until Willander arrives.

  • Like 2
  • Cheers 1
Posted

Need atleast 50% retention to even consider this. He just isn't very good, heck even at 50% retention, you can argue some of our prospects may surpass him in the depth chart within the time frame of this contract.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Ristolainen could be a buy low player. his stock is not as high as some of the other names out there like Rasmus Anderson, Marcus Pettersson or Jacob Trouba. 

 

His personality would probably fit in well with Vancouver. Our D coaches could help simplify his game like they did for Myers. He plays a similar style to Myers. 

 

He would be cheaper than the other names listed above to acquire and could help us right now. 

 

If management feels Branstrom Myers is a decent second pair than Soucy Ristolainen on the bottom pair would be ok. We would need to send Desjarnais back in the trade 

 

Edit.  all he really needs to be is better than Juulsen 


Hughes Hronek

Branstrom Myers

Soucy RIstolainen 

Edited by Rypien-Punch
  • ThereItIs 1
Posted
38 minutes ago, Rypien-Punch said:

Ristolainen could be a buy low player. his stock is not as high as some of the other names out there like Rasmus Anderson, Marcus Pettersson or Jacob Trouba. 

 

His personality would probably fit in well with Vancouver. Our D coaches could help simplify his game like they did for Myers. He plays a similar style to Myers. 

 

He would be cheaper than the other names listed above to acquire and could help us right now. 

 

If management feels Branstrom Myers is a decent second pair than Soucy Ristolainen on the bottom pair would be ok. We would need to send Desjarnais back in the trade 

 

Edit.  all he really needs to be is better than Juulsen 


Hughes Hronek

Branstrom Myers

Soucy RIstolainen 

 

 

Or this 

Hughes Ristolainen 

Branstrom Hronek

Soucy Myers 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

I am just here to see the Jett Woo + 3rd rounder trade offers. I don't agree with Alf very often, but I have to agree Risto lacks a little something between the ears. We already have that guy, his name is Myers.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...