Yes, it is a long standing issue that both parties are guitly of. I think the frustration from some close observes (maybe I shouldn't speak for them, but for me at least) at these recent articles is that the last few years have seen a nearly unprecidented (in peace time) re-capitalization of the Air Force and Navy. The Army could use for more love for sure, but the current gov't is actually doing a lot to buy new hardware.
We have had 2 deliveries and have 7 more on order for new strategic airlift and air-to-air refueling aircraft, we have ordered long-range surveilance and strike drones, we have ordered new fighter jets, we have ordered new anti-submarine warfare/ISR aircraft. These aren't press releases, these are signed contracts. That's all since 2020 and just for the Air Force.
The Navy is doing just as well, we have comissioned 3 new ships since 2021, and have 3 more Ice breakers and 2 at sea replenishment ships under construction at Canadian ship yards. As soon as the ice breakers are done, the frigates go into production. That contract is signed.
Crewing all the new equipment will be a challenge, no doubt. Recruitment is up in 2024, but not enough to make up the losses from 2018-2022.
So it's frustrating to read the 'same old story' of no investments into the Military be repeated when the facts have actually changed over the last couple of years.
and re: the bolded, yes they cut about $1 billion from travel and casual employees then added about $4 billion in investments in new capital.