-
Featured Topics
-
- 854 replies
- 28,320 views
-
Forums
-
Canucks Discussion
-
- 280k
- posts
-
- 3.9k
- posts
-
- 6.6k
- posts
-
-
Hockey Discussion
-
- 36.3k
- posts
-
- 72.7k
- posts
-
- 5.9k
- posts
-
- 7.8k
- posts
-
-
General Discussion
-
- 72k
- posts
-
- 31k
- posts
-
-
Welcome, Support, and Feedback
-
- 2k
- posts
-
Discord Server Link (892 visits to this link)
-
-
Who's Online 9 Members, 0 Anonymous, 93 Guests (See full list)
-
Member Statistics
1,676
Total Members1,152
Most Online
-
Forum Statistics
2.9k
Total Topics518.5k
Total Posts
-
New Topics
-
Recent Status Updates
-
Posts
-
By GrammaInTheTub · Posted
Quit making sense - they were arguing about what “maximizing” means in a different way -
LTIR does not automaticly guarantee you can exceed the cap by the cap hit of the player on LTIR. It allows you to replace the player, up to the maximum of their cap hit. If we were 1 mil under the cap, we could put Poolman on LTIR and be allowed to add a player(s) with a cap hit up to 2.5 million. We would only be allowed to exceed the cap by 1.5 million, because that's all it would take to replace the LTIR contract. -
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
