Jump to content

{GDT} Game #68 - Washington visits Vancouver - March 16th, 2024


Recommended Posts

  • -AJ- pinned and featured this topic
33 minutes ago, Rip The Mesh said:

 


The powerplay really isn’t some complicated thing yet I feel like they’re probably overthinking it at this point.

 

Just move your feet, open up shooting lanes, get pucks on net, and be ready for deflections and rebounds.

  • Cheers 2
  • Upvote 1
  • ThereItIs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Frozen Water Walker said:

Hogs & Pods on the PP so cool to try it out


Second unit looks better than the first IMO.

 

You got a point shot threat, Podz who has a bomb of a shot, Lindholm who can actually win draws, and Hoglander who’s scrappy in front of the net and can pick up rebounds.


First unit I just see a bunch of guys that either don’t have great shots or are reluctant to shoot.

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so here me out think Zadorov on LW with Petey, Hoglander can play the RW. Big buff style just imagine General Z in front of the net and for checking in the corners on dump ins.. this is of course when Myers comes back, this game? Or next? 

  • Like 1
  • Wiener 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete's running out of games to get going before the playoffs here. <70 point 18g pace since all star weekend. We somehow have to jumpstart Pete back to playing the way we know he can. 

 

Suter Pettersson Miller

Hoglander Lindholm Boeser

Dakota Bluger Garland

Mikheyev Lafferty Podkolzin

 

Maybe it would kickstart both Lindholm and Pete? Or be a complete disaster.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, FlippersUp said:

Pete's running out of games to get going before the playoffs here. <70 point 18g pace since all star weekend. We somehow have to jumpstart Pete back to playing the way we know he can. 

 

Suter Pettersson Miller

Hoglander Lindholm Boeser

Dakota Bluger Garland

Mikheyev Lafferty Podkolzin

 

Maybe it would kickstart both Lindholm and Pete? Or be a complete disaster.  

I'd try 

 

Pettersson   Lindholm   Podkolzin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...