Jump to content

Science


Recommended Posts

NOAA is predicting between 2am and 5am as the time when the coronal mass ejection will make its next spurt appear in our sky's magnetic field.

 

https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/communities/aurora-dashboard-experimental under "3-day forecast" (UT stands for UTC, which is essentially Greenwich Mean Time, so -7 hours to get PDT).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/technology/decoding-the-origins-of-earth-s-second-moon-a-scientific-breakthrough/ss-AA1o4AMO?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=fa1328e7a6b54e3ca5e5d01eb2afded7&ei=23

"Inquiring about the number of moons orbiting Earth might appear trivial at first glance, as conventionally we acknowledge just one. Yet, with a slight reframing of the query, the response could prove unexpectedly intriguing.

According to Scientific American, the answer depends on the framing of the question or the person's point of view, and the answer to how many moons the Earth has could be up to eleven.

-----------------------

mal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm guessing  god put this 500,000 year old tool on earth to test our faith in the 6,000 year old earth.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/scientists-discover-500-000-year-old-artefact-which-rewrites-early-human-history/ar-BB1mjqdT?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=4a841412264f4547a3d4f810e876f681&ei=12

"https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/scientists-discover-500-000-year-old-artefact-which-rewrites-early-human-history/ar-BB1mjqdT?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=4a841412264f4547a3d4f810e876f681&ei=12

"

One of the wonderful things about science is that we’re always discovering new things that not only expand our knowledge, but also change things we’d taken as a given for many years.

In that vein, it's been revealed that scientists have discovered an artefact dating back 500,000 years ago which ‘rewrites early human history’ and it could completely change our understanding of the earliest days of advanced life on our planet.

----------------------------------

mal

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gurn said:

I'm guessing  god put this 500,000 year old tool on earth to test our faith in the 6,000 year old earth.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/scientists-discover-500-000-year-old-artefact-which-rewrites-early-human-history/ar-BB1mjqdT?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=4a841412264f4547a3d4f810e876f681&ei=12

"https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/scientists-discover-500-000-year-old-artefact-which-rewrites-early-human-history/ar-BB1mjqdT?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=4a841412264f4547a3d4f810e876f681&ei=12

"

One of the wonderful things about science is that we’re always discovering new things that not only expand our knowledge, but also change things we’d taken as a given for many years.

In that vein, it's been revealed that scientists have discovered an artefact dating back 500,000 years ago which ‘rewrites early human history’ and it could completely change our understanding of the earliest days of advanced life on our planet.

----------------------------------

mal

 

Look man,

The majority of people on this planet believe in the bible so therefore it is literal fact. 

 

Will you ever learn?

  • Haha 2
  • ThereItIs 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bishopshodan said:

 

Look man,

The majority of people on this planet believe in the bible so therefore it is literal fact. 

 

Will you ever learn?

 

Truth is- any time I begin thinking like the majority of people-I automatically review my thoughts.

 

  • ThereItIs 1
  • MillerTime 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2024 at 11:37 AM, Gurn said:

^ I was living in Sidney, at the time.

Days and days of gray ash, blocking out daylight, and falling on everything.

 

I was in the East Kootenays at the time. Woke up hungover (long weekend) to ash and rock dust falling and an orange sun. Spent the next day washing it off. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was originally going to share this in the vaccine thread, since it's an offshoot of the pandemic thread from the old forum, but because the vaccine thread is now primarily about vaccines, and this article isn't, I guess this Science thread is the next closest approximation.

 

https://theconversation.com/masks-work-our-comprehensive-review-has-found-229658

 

Masks work.  Of course, the better the fit and the better the filtration method, the higher the efficacy.  Cloth masks won't filter much, but an N-95 or other respirator is likely to be very effective in minimizing the likelihood of infection -  if worn and used properly.  Who knew, eh? :classic_rolleyes:

 

excerpt:

 

Quote

The bottom line

When we looked at RCTs, we found that masks do protect in the community, and N95 respirators (masks made using higher-grade filtration material and designed to fit closely around the face to protect against airborne contaminants) are superior to masks in healthcare workers, especially when respirators were worn continuously at work. Non-RCT evidence also shows that masks work and respirators work better.

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...