qwijjibo
Members-
Posts
8,873 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Gallery
Store
Everything posted by qwijjibo
-
Ingram is an excellent goalie. And at his age, with his injury history Demko alone isn't worth the 6th oa. Goslies just dont return that in a trade. Add in the negative value of Mikheyev and its not even close. Add In the fact that you want them to include Ingram and another promising prospect for a 2nd and it's laughable
-
[PGT] Vancouver at Edmonton - Game 4-Round 2
qwijjibo replied to PhillipBlunt's topic in Canucks Talk
There hasn't been that many penalties in the series and the Canucks have actually had more opportunities than the Oliers have (edm 10 pp in 4 games, Van 12 pp in 4 games) If the league was actually trying to screw with the Canucks the refs would be calling everything. -
[PGT] Vancouver at Edmonton - Game 4-Round 2
qwijjibo replied to PhillipBlunt's topic in Canucks Talk
I doubt Tocchet would publicly call out Pettersson on his play if there was an injury involved. -
[PGT] Vancouver at Edmonton - Game 4-Round 2
qwijjibo replied to PhillipBlunt's topic in Canucks Talk
They had a better angle after the game. Clearly NOT a high stick -
[PGT] Vancouver at Edmonton - Game 4-Round 2
qwijjibo replied to PhillipBlunt's topic in Canucks Talk
Avery did that during the play though. Not really the same thing -
[PGT] Vancouver at Edmonton - Game 4-Round 2
qwijjibo replied to PhillipBlunt's topic in Canucks Talk
Except it wasn't a high stick -
Or, they realize they got away with a number of infractions that weren't called either. Maybe not as egrigous as the missed call on the Hughes play, but they've missed a number of potential calls against Vancouver too. All things bring equal they probably don't want the series being called tighter. Edmonton has had 4 powerplays in total in the series and has scored on 2 of them. With how ineffective Vancouver's pp has been in the playoffs so far, more powerplays for both teams is a bigger boon to Edmonton than it is Vancouver.
-
Hronek can refuse to sign his QO and opt for arbitration. It's unlikely he ends up getting less than $7-$7.5m in that case.
-
There are certain restrictions regarding a team walking away from an arbitration reward but I don't think there is any restrictions on trading a player who has gone through the arbitration process. That said any arbitration reward would be a 1 year deal that would see him end the season as a UFA. Since any team trading for him couldn't extend him until after the following Jan 1st it would certainly impact his trade value. Vancouver could still trade him after that initial arbitration award but the return might be questionable
-
I was just addressing your statement that if he signs a 1 year deal and doesn't live up to what he thinks he worth that he'd nr a valuable trade asset. If he's on a 1 year deal where he's ufa after he doesn't really have trade value to a Vancouver team who is in a playoff race. They'd keep him as an own rental and lose him for free.
-
[Proposal] Marner and Going all-in (HEAR ME OUT)
qwijjibo replied to Honkin Hronek's topic in Proposals and Armchair GM'ing
Players need to be with a team by the trade deadline on order to qualify for the 8th contract year. Trading just prior to free agency doesn't afford that option