DexM94 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Hi folks, exciting days ! Here you are two proposals to make our team playoffs ready : To VAN : C.Tanev (x% retained) To CGY : I.Cole, D-Petey To VAN : Monahan (x% retained) To MTL : 1st Rd Pick (2024), L.Karlsson (They need C) + Futures considerations if Monahan re sign. With Lotto line Without Lotto line 1st - Pettersson Miller Boeser Hoglander Miller Boeser 2nd - Hoglander Monahan Kuzmenko Pettersson Monohan Kuzmenko 3rd - Garland Blueger Joshua Garland Blueger Joshua 4th - Mikheyev Suter Lafferty Mikheyev Suter Lafferty + PdG, Aman 1D - Hughes Hronek 2D - Tanev Zadorov 3D - Soucy Myers + Juulsen Monahan seems to be the right deal, but we have to pay attention he wanted a last big paycheck (around 5M) at the end of his current contract. So we should don't overpay, unless we have a good deal on the table. Thoughts ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grizz.325 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 Trade #1 Absolutely NOT! Gaining Tanev and losing Cole is not shoring up our defence and basically a lateral move anyhow. Losing EP-D on top and that trade is a total backwards move. Trade #2 No thanks. I’m not against Monahan for the right price but not the player I’m looking to acquiring with our 1st rd pick. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DexM94 Posted January 27 Author Share Posted January 27 22 minutes ago, Grizz.325 said: Trade #1 Absolutely NOT! Gaining Tanev and losing Cole is not shoring up our defence and basically a lateral move anyhow. Losing EP-D on top and that trade is a total backwards move. Trade #2 No thanks. I’m not against Monahan for the right price but not the player I’m looking to acquiring with our 1st rd pick. thanks for your answer. Cole and Tanev provide the same stay at home, blocking shots capacities , while beeing better at every aspects (maybe not in interview ). i see him as an upgrade. the D-Petey is maybe way to much to trigger the salary retain's, but we need it to make it work. My first idea (and main idea) was Woo, but you have to give someting to get something i guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 You can't have conditions on if a player resigns. So either Montreal takes the deal as is or Vancouver adds those future considerations right away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 2 hours ago, DexM94 said: thanks for your answer. Cole and Tanev provide the same stay at home, blocking shots capacities , while beeing better at every aspects (maybe not in interview ). i see him as an upgrade. the D-Petey is maybe way to much to trigger the salary retain's, but we need it to make it work. My first idea (and main idea) was Woo, but you have to give someting to get something i guess. Cole is more resilient physically than tanev was for the canucks. Cant utilize a player when they are injured Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grizz.325 Posted January 27 Share Posted January 27 I don’t disagree with you that tanev is better defensively then cole, but we have soucey out for awhile and one has to presume we could see more injuries to our D core before seasons end, so I’d rather add without subtracting from the roster to ensure we have a competent back end come playoff time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.