Jump to content

[proposal] - Canucks package Garland, Podkolzin, and their 2024 1st for..............???


Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, Rip The Mesh said:

Regardless of the hot start; We cannot be giving firsts. Other then that, I'm sure there is probably a Toccett style player out there.

I'd rather Vancouver use that first to draft either another defenceman, or a two way centre. Unless the team get an offer it just can't pass up.

Posted
1 minute ago, Nucker67 said:

Pesce (and a mid-pick)

 

Let's win a Cup, 'cause Defense does that

 

Hughes - Hronek

Soucy - Pesce

Cole - Myers

 

Demko

Keeping Cole and Myers together is better. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, smithers joe said:

can't be more than a 5 mil player. i don't know what other teams would give up for that package. is the first and podkolzin sweetners to move garland?

No.  In theory, it's supposed to be a hockey package as opposed to sweeteners being used to move iGarly.  

Posted
33 minutes ago, Jeremy Hronek said:

No.  In theory, it's supposed to be a hockey package as opposed to sweeteners being used to move iGarly.  

every time they had tried to trade garland, the other team wants sweetners. good luck, lad.

  • Cheers 1
  • ThereItIs 1
Posted

Pesce or Hanifin might cost a bit more.

 

The 1st alone is probably enough to just move Garland. 

 

I'd do Beauvillier + 1st + Podkolzin (or maybe at a stretch Lekkerimaki) for Pesce or Hanifin but Lekker is looking real promising. Maybe give them one of our many defensive prospects from last year instead?

 

I'd go after Hanifin over Pesce though, we could really use a solid defensive 2LD to back up Hughes and take some minutes off him. We've got Hronek, Cole and Myers who can play RD and Willander coming in eventually, but at left defence we've got Quinn...and Soucy? Lol.

Posted
3 hours ago, DownUndaCanuck said:

Pesce or Hanifin might cost a bit more.

 

The 1st alone is probably enough to just move Garland. 

 

I'd do Beauvillier + 1st + Podkolzin (or maybe at a stretch Lekkerimaki) for Pesce or Hanifin but Lekker is looking real promising. Maybe give them one of our many defensive prospects from last year instead?

 

I'd go after Hanifin over Pesce though, we could really use a solid defensive 2LD to back up Hughes and take some minutes off him. We've got Hronek, Cole and Myers who can play RD and Willander coming in eventually, but at left defence we've got Quinn...and Soucy? Lol.

hanifin has said he wants to play in the usa. canucks are in canada, i think.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...