Rypien-Punch Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 To Van - Chris Tanev To Cal- Mikheyev, 2026 2nd To MTL - 2024 4th round pick (From NJ for Lazar) To Van - Michael Pezzetta Pettersson Miller Boeser Hoglander Lindholm Suter Joshua Blueger Garland Pezzetta Aman Lafferty Hughes Hronek Cole Tanev Zedorov Juulsen Soucy Myers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Brother your proposals are just a little too out there. Your last one with Wilson didn't make sense, and these two also don't make any sense. Firstly, your valuation Tanev is completely off. You're just trying to scam Calgary here. He is the most valuable trade bait on the market BY FAR. You're offering him a struggling winger and a distant pick. Here's what you need to do for your next proposal. You need to first think about why the other team would agree to these trades and not just gun after any player you like. We get it. You like tough guys. But guys like Wilson and Pezzetta aren't going anywhere. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DownUndaCanuck Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 I think Mikheyev + 2nd for Tanev makes a lot of sense, Calgary must be happy with how Kuzmenko's looked so far so why not go back and try to rinse us again? Meanwhile we're free from a 5M fourth liner who can be easily replaced internally, get a smidge of cap space and get Tanev for a playoff push. Then in the off-season we have all these old defencemen to decide on who leaves and who stays. Surely Myers goes, he's asking for 4M which is outrageous. Cole - it depends on how slow or tired he is at the end of this year because surely he doesn't have much good hockey left. Tanev is 34 now so maybe only has a year or two left as well. I'm sure we could nail down one of these guys to a cheap 2-3M deal and play them 17-18 minutes primarily on the PK and bottom pairing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_lai416 Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 16 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: I think Mikheyev + 2nd for Tanev makes a lot of sense, Calgary must be happy with how Kuzmenko's looked so far so why not go back and try to rinse us again? Meanwhile we're free from a 5M fourth liner who can be easily replaced internally, get a smidge of cap space and get Tanev for a playoff push. Then in the off-season we have all these old defencemen to decide on who leaves and who stays. Surely Myers goes, he's asking for 4M which is outrageous. Cole - it depends on how slow or tired he is at the end of this year because surely he doesn't have much good hockey left. Tanev is 34 now so maybe only has a year or two left as well. I'm sure we could nail down one of these guys to a cheap 2-3M deal and play them 17-18 minutes primarily on the PK and bottom pairing. kuzmenko coming off a 70+ point season and could be struggling coz of RT.. mikheyev career high is 32 points lol injury prone and have an extra year left on top.. mikheyev is good defensively but that's about it and who knows if he'll ever get his speed back from the injury.. it's been over a year now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miss Korea Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 29 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: I think Mikheyev + 2nd for Tanev makes a lot of sense, Calgary must be happy with how Kuzmenko's looked so far so why not go back and try to rinse us again? Meanwhile we're free from a 5M fourth liner who can be easily replaced internally, get a smidge of cap space and get Tanev for a playoff push. Then in the off-season we have all these old defencemen to decide on who leaves and who stays. Surely Myers goes, he's asking for 4M which is outrageous. Cole - it depends on how slow or tired he is at the end of this year because surely he doesn't have much good hockey left. Tanev is 34 now so maybe only has a year or two left as well. I'm sure we could nail down one of these guys to a cheap 2-3M deal and play them 17-18 minutes primarily on the PK and bottom pairing. You are feeding OP's delusions if you think a Mikheyev + some 2nd three years from now will get you Chris Tanev. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 That offer won't get tanev, and I don't see why Montreal would move Pezetta for a throw away pick Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Tanev would be great to add. Don’t do like the Jets and send their club into a downward spiral by adding a Hab. That club stinks. Don’t want any of those puck suckers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 all we need for taneve is a second round pick... mikheyev is valuable teams would want him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 22 minutes ago, PeteyBOI said: all we need for taneve is a second round pick... mikheyev is valuable teams would want him The runoured ask for Tanev is a 1st or a 2nd and a second asset. A 2nd alone likely doesn't get it done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 so yeah a second and woo... get er done Benning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HKSR Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 Is losing Mikheyev to add Tanev really an upgrade overall for the team? I'm not 100% convinced of that. Who replaces Mikheyev's PK and defensive minutes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 13 Share Posted February 13 4 hours ago, PeteyBOI said: so yeah a second and woo... get er done Benning I doubt a defenceman in his d+6 season who hasn't actually played a hane in the NHL and requires waivers counts as an attractive asset Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 3 hours ago, qwijjibo said: I doubt a defenceman in his d+6 season who hasn't actually played a hane in the NHL and requires waivers counts as an attractive asset and hes almost ready... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Just now, PeteyBOI said: and hes almost ready... Uh huh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 3 hours ago, qwijjibo said: I doubt a defenceman in his d+6 season who hasn't actually played a hane in the NHL and requires waivers counts as an attractive asset you would pay more than a second for tanev? hmmm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 minute ago, PeteyBOI said: you would pay more than a second for tanev? hmmm I'm pretty sure someone will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Just now, qwijjibo said: I'm pretty sure someone will 31 teams havent yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 2 minutes ago, PeteyBOI said: 31 teams havent yet Trade deadline is almost a month away still. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 Just now, qwijjibo said: Trade deadline is almost a month away still. your right still time for them to drop the price... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijjibo Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 1 minute ago, PeteyBOI said: your right still time for them to drop the price... Or for a bidding war to start 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 orororor idc... have a good night... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby James Posted February 14 Share Posted February 14 On 2/13/2024 at 2:54 AM, DownUndaCanuck said: I think Mikheyev + 2nd for Tanev makes a lot of sense, Calgary must be happy with how Kuzmenko's looked so far so why not go back and try to rinse us again? Meanwhile we're free from a 5M fourth liner who can be easily replaced internally, get a smidge of cap space and get Tanev for a playoff push I don't think it makes much sense for Calgary. The rumored asking price for Tanev is a 1st (likely will be a late rounder since contenders will be making the offers). I don't think Cal will want the Canucks 2nd and a struggling winger making $5 million per for another 2 years after this. They will likely just look for something simpler like a late 1st for Tanev (and they'll retain some on him). Maybe if the market is being overblown for him and no offers come in then something like this could be considered, but I think it'll only be if Cal runs out of options. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.