Jump to content

[Signing] Anaheim re-signs Jamie Drysdale


Recommended Posts

3 years, $2.3M AAV

 

Drysdale has had an unlucky start to his career.  Because of injuires, he was one game short of earning RFA status and instead became a 10.2(c), which meant Anaheim had total control over him.  It was weird for Verbeek to wait that long, but I'm glad they worked something out.

 

He has the skill, but he needs time to develop into a more well-rounded defenceman.  His numbers from 21-22 were not good.

 

image.png.6e945367123bb49c06d4c15099ba6bf0.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Barn Burner said:

Looks like Ottawa made the right choice.

 

Ottawa has their own little 10.2(c) RFA they need re-signed.  But the difference is that they really have no cap space for it.

 

Sens fans wouldn't mind this contract for Pinto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Miss Korea said:

 

Ottawa has their own little 10.2(c) RFA they need re-signed.  But the difference is that they really have no cap space for it.

 

Sens fans wouldn't mind this contract for Pinto.

What the hell are you talking about. What I'm talking about is... when Ottawa chose Sanderson over the supposedly higher upside "Drysdale",  whom by the way, was most people's first choice in that draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Barn Burner said:

What the hell are you talking about. What I'm talking about is... when Ottawa chose Sanderson over the supposedly higher upside "Drysdale",  whom by the way, was most people's first choice in that draft. 

It was a segue.  Ottawa is the other team that can't seem to re-sign one of their best young players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Miss Korea said:

It was a segue.  Ottawa is the other team that can't seem to re-sign one of their best young players.

Excuse me, but Drysdale was the one that most were predicting Ottawa would take, but instead chose Sanderson. 

 

Whom, they did sign to an 8 year deal. 

 

What don't you understand? I said the exact same thing in the post you responded to. 

 

Are you a lawyer or what? Get a life dude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Barn Burner said:

What the hell are you talking about. What I'm talking about is... when Ottawa chose Sanderson over the supposedly higher upside "Drysdale",  whom by the way, was most people's first choice in that draft. 

I'll admit I had Drysdale above Sanderson but agree that Sanderson is looking like the better pick. I do think its far to early to label Drysdale a bust though, with his skating his floor should be right around the contract he signed but with a much higher ceiling. Surprised he signed 3 years over 2, maybe he isn't confident in his recovery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tower102 said:

I'll admit I had Drysdale above Sanderson but agree that Sanderson is looking like the better pick. I do think its far to early to label Drysdale a bust though, with his skating his floor should be right around the contract he signed but with a much higher ceiling. Surprised he signed 3 years over 2, maybe he isn't confident in his recovery.

Sure. I'm not knocking the guy. All I was mentioning is that Ottawa, so far, made the right choice by drafting Sanderson. I remember that most people were pumping Drysdale's tires. Fair enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Miss Korea said:

It's fine.  He doesn't seem to get that I'm talking about a different issue Ottawa is dealing with (AKA lowballing their RFAs like Verbeek allegedly did).  Didn't expect such a reaction

to be fair, I don't think anyone would expect such an aggressive escalation for no apparent reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2023 at 1:08 PM, Miss Korea said:

3 years, $2.3M AAV

 

Drysdale has had an unlucky start to his career.  Because of injuires, he was one game short of earning RFA status and instead became a 10.2(c), which meant Anaheim had total control over him.  It was weird for Verbeek to wait that long, but I'm glad they worked something out.

 

He has the skill, but he needs time to develop into a more well-rounded defenceman.  His numbers from 21-22 were not good.

 

image.png.6e945367123bb49c06d4c15099ba6bf0.png


Another small Dman who can’t play any defence. I mean you can’t get any lower than 0%. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Elias Pettersson said:


Another small Dman who can’t play any defence. I mean you can’t get any lower than 0%. 

He is what we've termed a "fun" player in the analytics world - all offense, no defense.

 

image.png.78c366b41c6e9644ba4ca350727dfab4.png

 

Hey can you spot Patrice Bergeron!!???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...