Jump to content

[Waivers] October 3rd, 2023


Recommended Posts

Ah, so B-D and Sokolov are on today. Let the discussion continue!

 

I still think we wait for a better option but maybe the Canucks jump at a player since they might be a few spots too far down the pecking order.

  • Upvote 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dang, another waivers post for today. I'll just repeat myself for consistencies sake. Sokolov is the only really interesting name here for me. But I don't think I'd claim him for this particular roster. Unless we really feel like Joshua isn't where he should be and we waive him instead. Bernard-Docker should probably be an easy claim too, but we are overloaded on LD so meh for me but I can see a few other teams rushing to claim him. Feels like he should be in the NHL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, JeremyCuddles said:

Dang, another waivers post for today. I'll just repeat myself for consistencies sake. Sokolov is the only really interesting name here for me. But I don't think I'd claim him for this particular roster. Unless we really feel like Joshua isn't where he should be and we waive him instead. Bernard-Docker should probably be an easy claim too, but we are overloaded on LD so meh for me but I can see a few other teams rushing to claim him. Feels like he should be in the NHL.

JBD is a right shot Dman.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Devron said:

We don’t need anymore Larssons haha

 

I'd happily take Adam.

 

Just now, Huggy Bear said:

JBD looks interesting….sounds similar to McWard in age, size and two way abilities.

 

https://sportsforecaster.com/nhl/p/27287/Jacob_Bernard-Docker#:~:text=Bernard-Docker signed a two,acumen and shutdown ability too.

 

 

 

 

Certainly very intriguing....if we had no Myers and a legit Hughes partner, it would be more likely IMO. Otherwise, I still think we're best off seeing if we can snag a Bjork/Pachal/Coghlan

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, aGENT said:

 

I'd happily take Adam.

 

 

Certainly very intriguing....if we had no Myers and a legit Hughes partner, it would be more likely IMO. Otherwise, I still think we're best off seeing if we can snag a Bjork/Pachal/Coghlan

I got thinking of that other Larsen we had a few years ago as well. I think he got destroyed behind the net and never played with the Canucks again haha

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, aGENT said:

 

I'd happily take Adam.

 

 

Certainly very intriguing....if we had no Myers and a legit Hughes partner, it would be more likely IMO. Otherwise, I still think we're best off seeing if we can snag a Bjork/Pachal/Coghlan

 

Would you risk Juulsen to make room or send McWard down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kind of shocked to see Cal Petersen on waivers in Philly. I thought Philly traded for Cal to stabilize there goaltending. Shocked they've already given up on him given what they gave up for him.

 

Is Felix Sandstrom really doing that well in camp this year? Or is Cal really just that bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Quantum said:

Kind of shocked to see Cal Petersen on waivers in Philly. I thought Philly traded for Cal to stabilize there goaltending. Shocked they've already given up on him given what they gave up for him.

 

Is Felix Sandstrom really doing that well in camp this year? Or is Cal really just that bad?

They took him as a cap dump. His contract is horrible 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Quantum said:

Kind of shocked to see Cal Petersen on waivers in Philly. I thought Philly traded for Cal to stabilize there goaltending. Shocked they've already given up on him given what they gave up for him.

 

Is Felix Sandstrom really doing that well in camp this year? Or is Cal really just that bad?

 

Philly got paid in picks to take on that horrible contract.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Rekker said:

Trade them a waiver cleared Rathbone lefty. Then they won't lose one?


well played.  
 

Just read up on their preseason, and it sounds like Jiricek has looked good with Provorov on the second pair. If he stays up, Bjork should be available.

 

Werenski Severson 
Provorov Jiricek

Bean Gudbrandson?

Boqvist Peeke?
Bjork

  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...