Coconuts Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Pretty sure this thread happened earlier this season, but argue away again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Bob Long Posted February 12 Popular Post Share Posted February 12 Get him! 2 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted February 12 Author Share Posted February 12 Just now, Bob Long said: Get him! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jess Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Dangit Jimbo, how did you let this one go? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Long Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Just now, -AJ- said: Dangit Jimbo, how did you let this one go? Maybe squirrels ate his wifi connection? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammertime Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Aman doesn't require waivers??? Could we pick up Zack without losing anyone? It would be nice to have him back but not if it costs us anyone off our roster Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flickyoursedin Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Signed for 2 more years at $750 K. Listed as a Center but doesn’t take many faceoffs. Surprised honestly as he has nice qualities for a 4th line/13th forward. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coryberg Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Hammertime said: Aman doesn't require waivers??? Could we pick up Zack without losing anyone? It would be nice to have him back but not if it costs us anyone off our roster He does and would get snapped up in a heartbeat. His waiver threshold was 70 nhl games... he is at 98. Edited February 12 by Coryberg 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 33 minutes ago, Hammertime said: Aman doesn't require waivers??? Could we pick up Zack without losing anyone? It would be nice to have him back but not if it costs us anyone off our roster Why exactly? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 I'd definitely prefer him to PDG. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tas Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 5 minutes ago, stawns said: Why exactly? gotta catch 'em all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteyBOI Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 we cant claim because of the Zadorov suspension... need all our 8d slots right now... its a shame but i doubt we would even get a chance to claim him, surely someone will grab Big z. its unlikely we waive lafferty or PDG for zack, so a ez pass 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNucks1 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 27 minutes ago, King Heffy said: I'd definitely prefer him to PDG. why though?, also isnt PDG just filling in atm?, been a bit out of the loop missed a couple games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Just now, TNucks1 said: why though?, also isnt PDG just filling in atm?, been a bit out of the loop missed a couple games. I prefer the extra toughness over a guy who doesn't really excel at anything. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekker Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 (edited) I'm still old school and want a guy that's willing to fight. Is he the best at it? Meh. But he's always willing and his contract can be buried easily if need be or put back on waivers. I'd pick him up but I get many on here won't agree. Edited February 12 by Rekker 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNucks1 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 Just now, King Heffy said: I prefer the extra toughness over a guy who doesn't really excel at anything. not a bad forchecker also decent speed but has his moments, but rather some one from the farm than both of em. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 3 minutes ago, King Heffy said: I prefer the extra toughness over a guy who doesn't really excel at anything. Mac isn't good enough to play for Ottawa, but you think he would be for van? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 2 minutes ago, Rekker said: I'm still old school and want a guy that's willing to fight. Is he the best at it? Meh. But he's always willing and his contract can be buried easily if need be or put back on waivers. I'd pick him up but I get many on here won't agree. Again, he wasn't good enough to play for Ottawa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rekker Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 4 minutes ago, stawns said: Again, he wasn't good enough to play for Ottawa That doesn't mean much to me, different fits for players on different teams. Mark my words as teams will amp up the physicality against the Canucks come season end. We will wish we had a guy like this. But I get the angst. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiggums Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 34 minutes ago, Rekker said: I'm still old school and want a guy that's willing to fight. Is he the best at it? Meh. But he's always willing and his contract can be buried easily if need be or put back on waivers. I'd pick him up but I get many on here won't agree. dinosaur! Jk I agree and would love Mac on this team. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 1 hour ago, Hammertime said: Aman doesn't require waivers??? Could we pick up Zack without losing anyone? It would be nice to have him back but not if it costs us anyone off our roster Aman >>>>> MacEwan. I like MacEwan, but there's no reason at all to pick him up and sending Aman down to bring MacEwan in, only weakens our 4th line. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coryberg Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 (edited) 1 hour ago, PeteyBOI said: its unlikely we waive lafferty or PDG for zack, so a ez pass Edited February 12 by Coryberg 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 I'd take him over Phil the Thrill. Tbh. But ideally, no thanks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwarrior Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 I would love to bring him back, especially for the playoffs. But not at the risk of having to waive, and probably lose someone off the roster already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenbean30 Posted February 12 Share Posted February 12 He is not better than any of the players on our current roster.. People just like players that used to play for us and were a fan favourite, even if they weren't any good. He adds size, but that's literally the only thing he adds, worse at every other part of the game than our current players. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.