Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My guess is the Devils would want Hogs in return. I don't think I do it, but if Tochett really isn't into Hogs I could see where this may happen. Or Buffalo would want Pods. Again, I don't think I'd do that either. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Rekker said:

My guess is the Devils would want Hogs in return. I don't think I do it, but if Tochett really isn't into Hogs I could see where this may happen. Or Buffalo would want Pods. Again, I don't think I'd do that either. 

 

I'd send a draft pick their way. He hasn't exactly produced offensively as a former first round pick. So no to Höglander or Podkolzin. Mcleod also in his 20's, I don't know what his contract status is like, but if he's looking to be paid, then no. We need cheap ELC players that can make an impact on the roster. Trying to fill out the roster with players who continually want to be paid more and more isn't going to get this team anywhere. Need those younger players to produce on the roster. 

 

Now if the Canucks can get McLeod for cheap (like Lafferty), then I'll all for that of course. 

 

With that being said, it's probably not happening right. 

 

  • Cheers 1
Posted

Nah, he's one of the non-deniers from the WJC team. The Devils aren't getting rid of him because they can't keep him or because he's playing horribly - quite the opposite in fact. 

 

Easy pass. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Vintage 1
Posted
52 minutes ago, N4ZZY said:

he's looking to be paid, then no.

This is a valid point. Could be where Jersey has been in discussions and McLeod wanting too much.

Posted

Peripheral distractions aside, this is the the kind of potential “long term upgrade”  I’d like the see Allvin pursue.  
 

Younger RHC that we can hopefully lock up for a reasonable rate. 
 

We have Suter next year for a good amount but Bleuger was just a 1x1.9 and Joshua and Laffrety are also up in UFA.  
 

An RFA C with cost certainty would go a long way. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, thesauce said:

Nah, he's one of the non-deniers from the WJC team. The Devils aren't getting rid of him because they can't keep him or because he's playing horribly - quite the opposite in fact. 

 

Easy pass. 

Didn’t know he’s one of “those guys”. Allvin and JR are in the know. They’ll steer clear of “those” players. 

  • Thanks 2
Posted
14 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said:

 

So we need to wait until the year 2075?

McLeod is a very good younger pkayer. Why is Jersey moving on from him? They need guys who play with bite and are defensive minded. 

Posted
17 minutes ago, Elias Pettersson said:

 

So we need to wait until the year 2075?

No need to wait. It's pretty obvious along with Katchouk, Batherson & Formenton at this point. Probably 4 other non-WJC roster players currently in the NHL also involved too. 

  • ThereItIs 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Hammertime said:

until the WJC stuff is cleared up I wouldn't touch any of em. 

Oh it's all cleared up... they just buried it in the backyard and we'll never hear of it again.

  • Vintage 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Alflives said:

Didn’t know he’s one of “those guys”. Allvin and JR are in the know. They’ll steer clear of “those” players. 

 

do we actually know 'this'? 

 

I'm sure Allvin would do his due diligence. These days a GM would be shit canned for not ensuring that a player was vetted properly. He ain't Jimbo. 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

do we actually know 'this'? 

 

I'm sure Allvin would do his due diligence. These days a GM would be shit canned for not ensuring that a player was vetted properly. He ain't Jimbo. 

Agreed. JR and Allvin will know if McLeod is connected to the rape. 
Why is Jersey shopping a guy they clearly need? He’s one of their few abrasive, hard to play against younger guys. Hence the questions about “baggage”. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, Alflives said:

Agreed. JR and Allvin will know if McLeod is connected to the rape. 
Why is Jersey shopping a guy they clearly need? He’s one of their few abrasive, hard to play against younger guys. Hence the questions about “baggage”. 

 

Maybe they want Kuzy?

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, Alflives said:

If McLeod has no baggage that’s definitely a trade we should jump on. 

 

We might even get an extra asset.

 

We don't need Kuzy to score goals but we really need a rh3c 

  • ThereItIs 1
Posted
37 minutes ago, Bob Long said:

 

do we actually know 'this'? 

 

I'm sure Allvin would do his due diligence. These days a GM would be shit canned for not ensuring that a player was vetted properly. He ain't Jimbo. 

Doubt it considering the selection of the coach.  This management group has serious character issues and has shown a willingness to disgrace the franchise in the past.

  • Cheers 1
Posted
1 minute ago, King Heffy said:

Doubt it considering the selection of the coach.  This management group has serious character issues and has shown a willingness to disgrace the franchise in the past.

47885A91-E58C-4D11-B77A-A2A6AE3ADBF8.gif.38047f9c905217672c4c37dc9ab63020.gif

Posted
8 minutes ago, King Heffy said:

Doubt it considering the selection of the coach.  This management group has serious character issues and has shown a willingness to disgrace the franchise in the past.

 

I certainly didn't like how they vetted people (Colliton, Tocchet, Doerrie), but 2 out of 3 of them have done very well performance wise.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...